ALARP course — justification of the minimum practically acceptable level of risk
How to justify that the risk is "sufficiently low" - and convince the regulator, management and auditors. You will learn to systematically justify risk reduction decisions to avoid excessive costs - while meeting the requirements of Rostekhnadzor and international standards.
In the context of tightening industrial safety requirements, the question increasingly arises: "Have we done enough to reduce risk?" Simply "reducing risk" is not sufficient. It is necessary to prove that it has been reduced to the minimum practically acceptable level (ALARP) - that is, further reduction is impractical in terms of costs, efforts and capabilities.

Management System
ISO 9001:2015
ID 9000012276
www.tuv.com
Why is this course necessary for your business?
This course provides tools for informed decision-making within risk analysis frameworks (PHA, HAZOP, LOPA, QRA) and preparation for regulatory inspections. The course is based on global best practices: UK HSE Guidance, CCPS Guidelines, API RP 750, as well as Federal Law-116 requirements and Rostechnadzor methodological guidelines. The course aims to teach:
- Avoiding excessive investments in safety measures that do not provide proportional risk reduction.
- Preparing for Rostechnadzor inspections with documented justification of risk levels.
- Improving risk analysis efficiency (HAZOP/LOPA) through clear decision-making criteria.
- Reducing legal and reputational risks during accidents - you have evidence of "reasonable efforts".
What you will receive after training
- The essence and origin of the ALARP principle.
- Connection between ALARP and concepts of "acceptable risk" and "residual risk".
- Requirements of Russian and international regulation.
- Building ALARP diagrams (cost vs risk reduction graphs).
- Evaluating the "reasonableness" of risk reduction measures (time, money, technical feasibility).
- Documenting ALARP justification for reports and inspections.
- Course completion certificate from RBI Concept.
- Professional development certificate with registration in the FRDO registry.
- ALARP report templates and checklists for enterprise application.
- Approach approved by international auditors (TÜV, DNV).
- Ability to immediately apply the methodology within existing RBI/PHA projects.
- Expert support after training.
How the training is conducted
- Lectures by practicing engineers with experience at Gazprom, Rosneft, international consulting companies.
- Analysis of real cases: from justifying refusal of costly measures to successfully passing Rostechnadzor inspections.
- Practical assignment: building ALARP diagram for a real scenario.
- Online format with live interaction.
- Small groups (up to 12 participants).
- Access to closed platform with materials after the course.
Course program
- Evolution of industrial safety approaches.
- Difference between "zero risk", "acceptable risk" and ALARP.
- ALARP in the context of Federal Law-116 and Rostechnadzor orders.
- Sources: UK HSE, CCPS, API RP 750.
- Requirements for documenting ALARP decisions.
- Connection with SIL, LOPA, QRA and RBI.
- "Reasonableness" criteria: financial, temporal, technical.
- Building ALARP diagram (cost vs risk reduction graph).
- Zones: "unacceptable", "ALARP region", "broadly acceptable".
- How to evaluate the cost of risk reduction measures.
- How to prove that a measure is "inappropriate".
- Common mistakes in preparing ALARP reports.
- ALARP within HAZOP and LOPA frameworks.
- Role of working groups and experts.
- Preparation for regulatory inspections.
- Practical assignment: scenario analysis and building ALARP justification.
- Discussion, questions.
Your development path after the course
- RA-105: HAZOP and LOPA.
- RA-106: Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA).
- RA-101: Process Hazard Analysis (PHA).
- Audit of existing ALARP justifications.
- Consulting on preparation for Rostechnadzor inspections.
- Integration of ALARP into corporate safety standards.